Personalized Auto-Research: Towards a True AI Co-Scientist

arXiv:2608.148812026-08-13

AI协同科学家要成为真正的合作者,首先得知道自己在为谁做研究

如今的AI协同科学家系统能生成假设、设计实验、撰写论文,但完全不关心提出需求的人是谁,导致一名一年级博士生和一位资深教授输入同样的研究目标时,得到的结果几乎一样。本文提出了个性化自动研究(personalized auto-research)框架,把基于图谱的研究者个人表征贯穿到文献检索、假设搜索、实验、写作、评审等研究流程的每一个环节。这是一篇提出算法与评估思路的概念性论文,尚未给出实现系统或实测结果。

论文原文摘要（英文）

AI co-scientists that generate hypotheses, retrieve related work, design experiments, execute code, and draft full papers are beginning to change how research is carried out. Despite this rapid progress, state-of-the-art systems remain researcher-agnostic: given a research goal, they optimize novelty, validity, or reviewer score while ignoring the individual scientist who will use the output. This overlooks a fundamental fact about research, namely, that what counts as novel, valuable, or feasible depends on the researcher, including their prior work, methodological repertoire, and the collaborators and communities in which they are embedded. In this work, we introduce the problem of personalized auto-research, which conditions every stage of the research process on a representation of the individual researcher. We argue that personalization is not a convenience layer, but rather the fundamental property that allows an AI system to serve as a genuine co-scientist rather than a generic instrument. To address this problem, we propose a general and flexible framework that threads a graph-grounded researcher context through retrieval, hypothesis search, experimentation, writing, and review. The framework consists of three fundamental components: (i) graph-grounded researcher representations, (ii) personalization across the full research pipeline, and (iii) evaluation grounded in the individual. Notably, we highlight a one-size-fits-all failure mode where distinct researchers issuing the same goal receive essentially the same research, erasing the tacit knowledge through which novel ideas arise. Finally, we discuss fundamental open problems and challenges.

作者 · Bo Ni