Computational Orientalism: Measuring Structural Discourse Bias in Large Language Models Using the Middle East Cultural Sensitivity Score (MECSS)

arXiv:2608.181002026-08-20

问AI关于中东的问题,它可能不带明显偏见,却仍用西方框架来解释一切

这篇论文检验了GPT-4和Falcon3-7B-Instruct是否通过结构性框架而非公开偏见来复制东方主义式的表达。作者提出了MECSS评分框架,把爱德华·萨义德的东方主义理论拆解成七个可测量的维度,并分析了280段对话(共1120次问答)。结果显示两个模型都系统性地表现出这种偏见模式,而在阿布扎比用阿拉伯语数据训练的Falcon,得分反而高于GPT-4。

论文原文摘要（英文）

AI systems now shape how hundreds of millions of people learn about cultures other than their own. When someone asks one of these systems about the Middle East, they do not receive neutral facts. They receive a representation shaped by the frameworks embedded in training data, and that data is overwhelmingly Western and English-language. This paper asks whether that representation is Orientalist in Said's sense: whether it denies agency to Middle Eastern actors, treats Western frameworks as neutral while marking non-Western knowledge as particular, and explains the region through categories it did not produce. Standard fairness metrics cannot answer this, because they detect explicit prejudice rather than structural framing. This paper introduces the Middle East Cultural Sensitivity Score (MECSS), a framework that turns Said's seven Orientalist operations into measurable dimensions, and the term "Said-washing" for a specific failure: a model that disclaims generalization, then reproduces the structure it disclaimed. Across 280 conversations (1,120 exchanges), GPT-4 and Falcon3-7B-Instruct both reproduce Orientalist patterns systematically, through structural positioning rather than open stereotyping. GPT-4 scores moderately (mean MECSS 1.73); Falcon3-7B-Instruct scores higher (2.18), even though it was built in Abu Dhabi and trained with Arabic content. This is evidence against the assumption that building a model regionally makes it less Orientalist, though the models differ in size as well as origin, so geography cannot be isolated as the cause. Epistemic Center, the treatment of Western frameworks as unmarked universals, scores near the top of the scale for both models. Said-washing appears in 87.9% of GPT-4 conversations, a pattern existing metrics cannot see. Reducing this bias requires changing what models learn from, not only adding languages or relocating institutions.

作者 · Maha Shahid