DeepTCM1.0: A Multi-Expert AI Agent for Deciphering Mechanisms of Chinese Herbal Formulae Based on General Large Language Models

arXiv:2608.181032026-08-20

11个AI专家智能体组队,用来解读一味中药经典方剂的作用机制

广州中医药大学等机构的研究者以通用大语言模型DeepSeek V3.2为核心大脑,打造了DeepTCM1.0多智能体系统,让11个模拟专家协作分析中药复方的作用机制。他们以经典方剂桂枝汤为案例进行验证,结果显示该系统的评分显著优于单一大语言模型。该框架无需额外构建数据库或对模型进行微调,完全依靠提示词工程实现。

论文原文摘要（英文）

Background: Mechanistic elucidation of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) compound formulas remains a central challenge in the modernization of TCM. Conventional approaches, including data mining and network pharmacology, are insufficient for achieving deep integration between classical TCM theory and modern scientific research. In addition, direct question-answering using general-purpose artificial intelligence large language models is limited by inadequate adaptation to TCM theoretical frameworks and susceptibility to reasoning hallucinations. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop intelligent analytical methods aligned with the holistic principles of TCM. Objective: To establish a multi-expert intelligent agent framework integrating classical TCM theory with modern life sciences, thereby enabling systematic and interpretable mechanistic analysis of TCM compound formulas, with Guizhi Decoction serving as a representative validation case. Methods: The DeepTCM1.0 framework was constructed based on the general-purpose large language model DeepSeek V3.2. It adopts a three-tier collaborative architecture and a three-round iterative quality-control workflow, simulating the collaborative analytical process of 11 interdisciplinary intelligent agents. The framework was applied to the mechanistic interpretation of Guizhi Decoction from the dual perspectives of classical traditional Chinese medicine theory and modern scientific research. Framework performance was comprehensively evaluated through double-blind five-dimensional scoring, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reliability testing, Mann-Whitney U tests, and effect size analysis. The evaluation employed four independent large language models as evaluators, each conducting five rounds of repeated scoring on five anonymized reports, resulting in a total of 100 independent scoring assessments.

作者 · Wenxin Duan, Hanwei Wang, Zhongying Peng, Zhonghua Lu, Jiayi An, Fan Song, Yong Liang