Operationalizing Narrative Entropy (Sn): A Two-Scene Registered Pilot Report and Pre-Validation Protocol

arXiv:2608.181092026-08-20

试图给故事带给读者的'信息负荷'打分,结果却出乎作者意料

作者首次将名为叙事熵(Narrative Entropy, Sn)的构想套用到两个真实场景上,人工计算出分数。塔伦蒂诺电影中九人快速对话的餐厅场景得分18.8,反而低于雷蒙德·卡佛短篇小说中单人内心独白段落的30.0分,与作者原本的直觉相反。作者没有为了迎合直觉去修改公式,而是如实记录这一矛盾,并提前公开了后续验证的实验计划。

论文原文摘要（英文）

Narrative Entropy ($S_n$) is a proposed quantitative descriptor within the Bulut Doctrine, intended to capture the rate at which a narrative text imposes processing load on a reader. To date the construct has been defined theoretically but not operationalized against real texts. This report documents the first such operationalization (the v2.0 pilot): two narrative scenes -- the opening restaurant scene of Tarantino's Reservoir Dogs and the opening interior-monologue block of Carver's Cathedral -- were coded manually by a single rater and scored with the candidate formula $S_n = I_f \times C_b \times t$. The result was a divergence from the author's naive intuition: the single-voice monologue ($S_n = 30.0$) scored higher than the nine-character dialogue scene ($S_n = 18.8$). We treat this not as a result to be explained away but as the central finding, and we refuse post-hoc adjustment of the formula. Three competing interpretations are presented -- formula incompleteness, genuine high-load prose, and measurement error -- and the design that would discriminate among them is pre-registered. This v2.1 revision adds: (i) explicit acknowledgement that the divergence is consistent with the pre-existing architectural framework which privileges inferential reconstruction over surface declaration, and that what was called "contrary to expectation" in v2.0 reflected the author's anticipatory intuition rather than the methodology's own predictions; (ii) a pre-registered construct validity test for $I_f$, motivated by the observation that $I_f$ values were nearly equal across the two scenes (1.71 vs 1.58) despite the headline $S_n$ divergence. The document functions simultaneously as a pilot report ($n=2$) and as a pre-registration of the next-stage protocol. It does not claim that $S_n$ has been validated.

作者 · Levent Bulut