EDITBRIDGE: Towards Faithful and Efficient Ultra-High-Resolution Image Editing
Editing images at low resolution first, then redrawing them to match the high-resolution original gets 4K edits done in 61 seconds
High-resolution image editing usually only works below 1K because attention computation explodes with image size, and the common workaround of editing at low resolution then upscaling tends to invent details that clash with the original or produce blurry or over-sharpened textures. EditBridge instead trains a diffusion bridge that directly transforms the low-resolution edited result into the high-resolution version, guided by the original high-resolution source, paired with a sparse attention mechanism that only looks at precisely matched regions for unedited areas and nearby regions for edited areas. This delivers a 3.6-8.4x speedup at 2K versus super-resolution baselines and completes 4K editing in 61 seconds.
METAL MEDIA explanatory visual
Editing images at low resolution first, then redrawing them to match the high-resolution original gets 4K edits done in 61 seconds
- 01High-resolution editing is usually limited to below 1K because attention computation scales quadratically with image size, causing memory and speed bottlenecks
- 02The common two-stage workaround of low-res editing plus super-resolution upscaling causes information divergence (hallucinated details that contradict the original) and texture degradation (over-smoothed or over-sharpened artifacts)
- 03EditBridge uses a diffusion bridge that directly learns the transition from the low-resolution edited image to the high-resolution target, instead of regenerating from noise, preserving structural information from the source throughout
- 04Prior-Guided Block-wise Sparse Attention (PG-BSA) restricts unedited regions to attend only to their exact corresponding location in the source image, and edited regions to a small surrounding window, sharply cutting computation
- 05At 2K it is 3.6-8.4x faster than super-resolution baselines (4.08 seconds), 4K editing finishes in 61 seconds, and a user study shows it beats baselines in detail preservation, realism, and aesthetics
What they did
- High-resolution editing is usually limited to below 1K because attention computation scales quadratically with image size, causing memory and speed bottlenecks
- The common two-stage workaround of low-res editing plus super-resolution upscaling causes information divergence (hallucinated details that contradict the original) and texture degradation (over-smoothed or over-sharpened artifacts)
- EditBridge uses a diffusion bridge that directly learns the transition from the low-resolution edited image to the high-resolution target, instead of regenerating from noise, preserving structural information from the source throughout
- Prior-Guided Block-wise Sparse Attention (PG-BSA) restricts unedited regions to attend only to their exact corresponding location in the source image, and edited regions to a small surrounding window, sharply cutting computation
- At 2K it is 3.6-8.4x faster than super-resolution baselines (4.08 seconds), 4K editing finishes in 61 seconds, and a user study shows it beats baselines in detail preservation, realism, and aesthetics
| Method | Haar ↑ | mPSNR ↑ | mSSIM ↑ | mMSE ↓ | mLPIPS ↓ | Time (s) ↓ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1K Resolution | ||||||
| Direct Inference | 0.3973 | 16.8078 | 0.7539 | 0.0549 | 0.4116 | 20.00 |
| DiT4SR [14] | 0.4127 | 14.5031 | 0.7092 | 0.0554 | 0.4818 | 28.47 |
| DiT-SR [9] | 0.4523 | 16.7152 | 0.7955 | 0.0430 | 0.4403 | 2.44 |
| PiSA-SR [32] | 0.4247 | 15.2115 | 0.7481 | 0.0486 | 0.4492 | 0.30 |
| TSD-SR [12] | 0.4127 | 15.3864 | 0.7531 | 0.0516 | 0.4628 | 0.42 |
| HiFlow [7] | 0.3012 | 11.6964 | 0.6489 | 0.1323 | 0.6012 | 5.12 |
| ScaleEdit [22] | 0.4824 | 16.8461 | 0.8206 | 0.0408 | 0.3784 | 181.20 |
| Ours | 0.4992 | 18.6536 | 0.8686 | 0.0369 | 0.3829 | 0.84 |
| 2K Resolution | ||||||
| Direct Inference | 0.2254 | 13.5262 | 0.7491 | 0.0880 | 0.6700 | 82.14 |
| DiT4SR [14] | 0.3806 | 15.1298 | 0.7468 | 0.0516 | 0.5348 | 113.32 |
| DiT-SR [9] | 0.4210 | 17.2430 | 0.8265 | 0.0423 | 0.4738 | 14.82 |
| PiSA-SR [32] | 0.4046 | 16.2433 | 0.8061 | 0.0446 | 0.4702 | 20.22 |
| TSD-SR [12] | 0.4046 | 16.2021 | 0.7952 | 0.0467 | 0.4910 | 34.20 |
| HiFlow [7] | 0.3144 | 13.9314 | 0.7377 | 0.0759 | 0.5113 | 33.11 |
| ScaleEdit [22] | 0.4583 | 16.5510 | 0.6818 | 0.0485 | 0.5197 | 662.50 |
| Ours | 0.4673 | 18.6366 | 0.8712 | 0.0377 | 0.3903 | 4.08 |
| 4K Resolution | ||||||
| Direct Inference | 0.2134 | 10.7086 | 0.5411 | 0.1281 | 0.7774 | 695.23 |
| DiT4SR [14] | 0.4002 | 20.2771 | 0.7535 | 0.0133 | 0.3510 | 533.83 |
| DiT-SR [9] | 0.4267 | 16.8615 | 0.6818 | 0.0415 | 0.5436 | 119.68 |
| PiSA-SR [32] | 0.4267 | 21.6200 | 0.7974 | 0.0108 | 0.2687 | 111.42 |
| TSD-SR [12] | 0.4124 | 22.2766 | 0.8035 | 0.0074 | 0.2399 | 108.72 |
| HiFlow [7] | 0.3307 | 14.4400 | 0.6719 | 0.0664 | 0.6038 | 129.30 |
| ScaleEdit [22] | 0.4116 | 18.5714 | 0.7638 | 0.0390 | 0.6015 | 3601.20 |
| Ours | 0.4279 | 24.1380 | 0.8347 | 0.0049 | 0.2112 | 61.10 |
| Setting | Method | HaarPSI↑ | mPSNR↑ | mSSIM↑ | mMSE↓ | mLPIPS↓ | Time (s)↓ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1K | Ours | 0.499 | 18.653 | 0.868 | 0.036 | 0.382 | 0.84 |
| FullAttention | 0.539 | 19.080 | 0.857 | 0.030 | 0.599 | 0.73 | |
| 2K | Ours | 0.467 | 18.636 | 0.871 | 0.037 | 0.390 | 4.08 |
| FullAttention | 0.505 | 17.918 | 0.705 | 0.041 | 0.425 | 4.71 |
| Method | HaarPSI↑ | mPSNR↑ | mSSIM↑ | mMSE↓ | mLPIPS↓ | Time(s)↓ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 steps | 0.4131 | 15.7269 | 0.7763 | 0.0474 | 0.4739 | 4.03 |
| 10 steps | 0.4020 | 15.4190 | 0.7636 | 0.0494 | 0.4662 | 8.10 |
| Ours (1 step) | 0.4991 | 18.6535 | 0.8685 | 0.0368 | 0.3829 | 0.84 |
Why it matters
High-resolution image editing is needed in professional workflows like photo retouching and design, but until now speed and fidelity to the original had to be traded off. This work shows both can be achieved together, lowering the barrier to putting high-resolution editing into real products.
Terms in this paper
- Diffusion Bridge · a generative model trained to transition directly between a start image and a target image rather than from random noise
- Super-Resolution · a technique that upscales a low-resolution image to high resolution, having to invent missing detail
- PG-BSA (Prior-Guided Block-wise Sparse Attention) · an attention mechanism that selectively attends only to spatially corresponding regions in the source image to reduce computation
- DiT (Diffusion Transformer) · a type of image generation model built on the Transformer architecture
- LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) · a fine-tuning method that trains a small number of added parameters instead of the whole model
Figures we cannot republish
- Figure 1: Motivation of the proposed method. (a) and (b) compare the standard high-resolution image editing paradigm with our approach. (c) analyzes the inherent limitations of existing methods.
- Figure 2: Overview of our proposed EditBridge. The upper section illustrates the inference process of the diffusion bridge, which transports the low-resolution edit to its high-resolution counterpart. The lower section details the construction of the correspondence prior and the proposed Prior-Guided Sparse Attention (PG-BSA) mechanism.
- Figure 3: Qualitative comparison at 1K resolution. Our method better preserves fidelity while enhancing visual clarity.
- Figure 4: Qualitative comparison at 2K resolution. Our method better preserves fidelity while enhancing visual clarity.
- Figure 5: Ablation of Attention Sparsity. Full attention leads to noticeable source-induced artifacts, whereas our sparse attention maintains superior visual fidelity and alignment.
- Figure 6: Impact of sampling steps. Perceptual quality and high-frequency details are maximized at T=1. Increasing the number of inference steps does not yield significant visual gains, further validating the efficiency of our refinement framework.
- Figure 7: Results of the user study across three dimensions: Detail Preservation, Realism, and Aesthetics. Our method consistently outperforms all baselines in human preference.
- Figure 8: Visual results at 1K resolution.
- Figure 9: Visual results at 2K resolution.
Original abstract (English)
High-resolution image editing is increasingly demanded in professional workflows, yet existing diffusion-based models remain constrained to resolutions below 1K due to quadratic attention complexity and prohibitive memory requirements. A prevalent workaround employs a two-stage pipeline: editing at low resolution followed by independent super-resolution. However, this approach suffers from two critical issues: information divergence, where hallucinated details contradict the original high-resolution (HR) source, and texture degradation, manifesting as over-smoothed or over-sharpened artifacts. We propose EditBridge, a diffusion bridge framework for efficient ultra high-resolution editing. Unlike conventional diffusion that regenerates from noise, we formulate refinement as structured data-to-data translation from the low-resolution (LR) edited result to its HR counterpart, explicitly conditioned on the original HR source to preserve authentic details. To efficiently incorporate HR source guidance, we introduce a prior-guided block-wise sparse attention mechanism that exploits semantic correspondence from first-stage editing to constrain cross-image interactions to spatially aligned regions, significantly reducing computational overhead. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EditBridge achieves high-fidelity editing with superior perceptual quality at resolutions up to 4K, delivering 3.6--8.4times speedup at 2K and enabling practical 4K editing in 61 seconds.
Read on arXivLatest papers
- SWE-bench Science: Can Coding Agents Resolve Engineering Tasks in Science?AI coding agents were tested on fixing real scientific software, and even the best one failed more than half the time
- FlashPrefill V2: Block-Sparse Prefill Attention for Long-Context LLM ServingMaking sparse attention fast enough and accurate enough for real LLM serving, not just papers
- PolicyGuide: From Guarding One Action to Guiding the Whole Workflow for Policy-Compliant LLM AgentsMaking customer-service AI agents follow the whole procedure, not just avoid one bad action
- EXIMO: VLM Guided Exploration of VLA PoliciesTeaching a robot new chores without human teleoperation, by letting a chatty AI supervise it
- EnvHarness: Awakening Static Worlds for Agent LearningInstead of building new training worlds from scratch, this work adds a plug-in layer that reshapes existing ones around each agent's actual weaknesses
- Bounded Sovereignty and the Control Tax: Pricing AI Oversight When the Deployer Does Not Own the ModelCompanies that rent AI instead of owning it can only do half of AI safety oversight
- Beyond Imitation: Filtering On-Policy Distillation by Reasoning ProgressA fix for AI models that get penalized by their teacher even when they're reasoning correctly
- PersonalBench: Measuring the Authorship Gap in LLM PersonalizationAI can be prompted to write 'like someone,' but its own voice never fully disappears