Computational Orientalism: Measuring Structural Discourse Bias in Large Language Models Using the Middle East Cultural Sensitivity Score (MECSS)

arXiv:2608.181002026-08-20

Ask an AI about the Middle East, and it may explain the region through a Western lens without ever using an obvious slur

This paper tests whether GPT-4 and Falcon3-7B-Instruct reproduce Orientalist patterns not through open prejudice but through structural framing. It builds MECSS, a scoring framework that turns Edward Said's theory of Orientalism into seven measurable dimensions, and applies it to 280 conversations (1,120 exchanges). Both models scored as systematically biased, with Falcon, built in Abu Dhabi with Arabic training data, scoring higher than GPT-4 rather than lower.

Original abstract (English)

AI systems now shape how hundreds of millions of people learn about cultures other than their own. When someone asks one of these systems about the Middle East, they do not receive neutral facts. They receive a representation shaped by the frameworks embedded in training data, and that data is overwhelmingly Western and English-language. This paper asks whether that representation is Orientalist in Said's sense: whether it denies agency to Middle Eastern actors, treats Western frameworks as neutral while marking non-Western knowledge as particular, and explains the region through categories it did not produce. Standard fairness metrics cannot answer this, because they detect explicit prejudice rather than structural framing. This paper introduces the Middle East Cultural Sensitivity Score (MECSS), a framework that turns Said's seven Orientalist operations into measurable dimensions, and the term "Said-washing" for a specific failure: a model that disclaims generalization, then reproduces the structure it disclaimed. Across 280 conversations (1,120 exchanges), GPT-4 and Falcon3-7B-Instruct both reproduce Orientalist patterns systematically, through structural positioning rather than open stereotyping. GPT-4 scores moderately (mean MECSS 1.73); Falcon3-7B-Instruct scores higher (2.18), even though it was built in Abu Dhabi and trained with Arabic content. This is evidence against the assumption that building a model regionally makes it less Orientalist, though the models differ in size as well as origin, so geography cannot be isolated as the cause. Epistemic Center, the treatment of Western frameworks as unmarked universals, scores near the top of the scale for both models. Said-washing appears in 87.9% of GPT-4 conversations, a pattern existing metrics cannot see. Reducing this bias requires changing what models learn from, not only adding languages or relocating institutions.

Authors · Maha Shahid