EDITBRIDGE: Towards Faithful and Efficient Ultra-High-Resolution Image Editing

arXiv:2608.180632026-08-17

Editing images at low resolution first, then redrawing them to match the high-resolution original gets 4K edits done in 61 seconds

High-resolution image editing usually only works below 1K because attention computation explodes with image size, and the common workaround of editing at low resolution then upscaling tends to invent details that clash with the original or produce blurry or over-sharpened textures. EditBridge instead trains a diffusion bridge that directly transforms the low-resolution edited result into the high-resolution version, guided by the original high-resolution source, paired with a sparse attention mechanism that only looks at precisely matched regions for unedited areas and nearby regions for edited areas. This delivers a 3.6-8.4x speedup at 2K versus super-resolution baselines and completes 4K editing in 61 seconds.

METAL MEDIA explanatory visual

Editing images at low resolution first, then redrawing them to match the high-resolution original gets 4K edits done in 61 seconds

01High-resolution editing is usually limited to below 1K because attention computation scales quadratically with image size, causing memory and speed bottlenecks
02The common two-stage workaround of low-res editing plus super-resolution upscaling causes information divergence (hallucinated details that contradict the original) and texture degradation (over-smoothed or over-sharpened artifacts)
03EditBridge uses a diffusion bridge that directly learns the transition from the low-resolution edited image to the high-resolution target, instead of regenerating from noise, preserving structural information from the source throughout
04Prior-Guided Block-wise Sparse Attention (PG-BSA) restricts unedited regions to attend only to their exact corresponding location in the source image, and edited regions to a small surrounding window, sharply cutting computation
05At 2K it is 3.6-8.4x faster than super-resolution baselines (4.08 seconds), 4K editing finishes in 61 seconds, and a user study shows it beats baselines in detail preservation, realism, and aesthetics

An explanatory diagram made by METAL MEDIA, not a figure supplied by the paper's authors.

What they did

High-resolution editing is usually limited to below 1K because attention computation scales quadratically with image size, causing memory and speed bottlenecks
The common two-stage workaround of low-res editing plus super-resolution upscaling causes information divergence (hallucinated details that contradict the original) and texture degradation (over-smoothed or over-sharpened artifacts)
EditBridge uses a diffusion bridge that directly learns the transition from the low-resolution edited image to the high-resolution target, instead of regenerating from noise, preserving structural information from the source throughout
Prior-Guided Block-wise Sparse Attention (PG-BSA) restricts unedited regions to attend only to their exact corresponding location in the source image, and edited regions to a small surrounding window, sharply cutting computation
At 2K it is 3.6-8.4x faster than super-resolution baselines (4.08 seconds), 4K editing finishes in 61 seconds, and a user study shows it beats baselines in detail preservation, realism, and aesthetics

Table 1: Quantitative comparison results. ↑/↓ indicate whether higher/lower values are better. Bold numbers represent the best results.
Method	Haar ↑	mPSNR ↑	mSSIM ↑	mMSE ↓	mLPIPS ↓	Time (s) ↓
1K Resolution
Direct Inference	0.3973	16.8078	0.7539	0.0549	0.4116	20.00
DiT4SR [14]	0.4127	14.5031	0.7092	0.0554	0.4818	28.47
DiT-SR [9]	0.4523	16.7152	0.7955	0.0430	0.4403	2.44
PiSA-SR [32]	0.4247	15.2115	0.7481	0.0486	0.4492	0.30
TSD-SR [12]	0.4127	15.3864	0.7531	0.0516	0.4628	0.42
HiFlow [7]	0.3012	11.6964	0.6489	0.1323	0.6012	5.12
ScaleEdit [22]	0.4824	16.8461	0.8206	0.0408	0.3784	181.20
Ours	0.4992	18.6536	0.8686	0.0369	0.3829	0.84
2K Resolution
Direct Inference	0.2254	13.5262	0.7491	0.0880	0.6700	82.14
DiT4SR [14]	0.3806	15.1298	0.7468	0.0516	0.5348	113.32
DiT-SR [9]	0.4210	17.2430	0.8265	0.0423	0.4738	14.82
PiSA-SR [32]	0.4046	16.2433	0.8061	0.0446	0.4702	20.22
TSD-SR [12]	0.4046	16.2021	0.7952	0.0467	0.4910	34.20
HiFlow [7]	0.3144	13.9314	0.7377	0.0759	0.5113	33.11
ScaleEdit [22]	0.4583	16.5510	0.6818	0.0485	0.5197	662.50
Ours	0.4673	18.6366	0.8712	0.0377	0.3903	4.08
4K Resolution
Direct Inference	0.2134	10.7086	0.5411	0.1281	0.7774	695.23
DiT4SR [14]	0.4002	20.2771	0.7535	0.0133	0.3510	533.83
DiT-SR [9]	0.4267	16.8615	0.6818	0.0415	0.5436	119.68
PiSA-SR [32]	0.4267	21.6200	0.7974	0.0108	0.2687	111.42
TSD-SR [12]	0.4124	22.2766	0.8035	0.0074	0.2399	108.72
HiFlow [7]	0.3307	14.4400	0.6719	0.0664	0.6038	129.30
ScaleEdit [22]	0.4116	18.5714	0.7638	0.0390	0.6015	3601.20
Ours	0.4279	24.1380	0.8347	0.0049	0.2112	61.10

Table 2: Performance comparison between our PG-BSA and full attention across 1K and 2K settings. ↑/↓ indicate whether higher/lower values are better. Bold numbers represent the best results within each resolution block.
Setting	Method	HaarPSI↑	mPSNR↑	mSSIM↑	mMSE↓	mLPIPS↓	Time (s)↓
1K	Ours	0.499	18.653	0.868	0.036	0.382	0.84
FullAttention	0.539	19.080	0.857	0.030	0.599	0.73
2K	Ours	0.467	18.636	0.871	0.037	0.390	4.08
FullAttention	0.505	17.918	0.705	0.041	0.425	4.71

Table 3: Quantitative evaluation of varying inference steps. ↑/↓ indicate whether higher/lower values are better. Bold numbers represent the best results.
Method	HaarPSI↑	mPSNR↑	mSSIM↑	mMSE↓	mLPIPS↓	Time(s)↓
5 steps	0.4131	15.7269	0.7763	0.0474	0.4739	4.03
10 steps	0.4020	15.4190	0.7636	0.0494	0.4662	8.10
Ours (1 step)	0.4991	18.6535	0.8685	0.0368	0.3829	0.84

Why it matters

High-resolution image editing is needed in professional workflows like photo retouching and design, but until now speed and fidelity to the original had to be traded off. This work shows both can be achieved together, lowering the barrier to putting high-resolution editing into real products.

Terms in this paper

Diffusion Bridge · a generative model trained to transition directly between a start image and a target image rather than from random noise
Super-Resolution · a technique that upscales a low-resolution image to high resolution, having to invent missing detail
PG-BSA (Prior-Guided Block-wise Sparse Attention) · an attention mechanism that selectively attends only to spatially corresponding regions in the source image to reduce computation
DiT (Diffusion Transformer) · a type of image generation model built on the Transformer architecture
LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) · a fine-tuning method that trains a small number of added parameters instead of the whole model

Figures we cannot republish

Figure 1: Motivation of the proposed method. (a) and (b) compare the standard high-resolution image editing paradigm with our approach. (c) analyzes the inherent limitations of existing methods.
Figure 2: Overview of our proposed EditBridge. The upper section illustrates the inference process of the diffusion bridge, which transports the low-resolution edit to its high-resolution counterpart. The lower section details the construction of the correspondence prior and the proposed Prior-Guided Sparse Attention (PG-BSA) mechanism.
Figure 3: Qualitative comparison at 1K resolution. Our method better preserves fidelity while enhancing visual clarity.
Figure 4: Qualitative comparison at 2K resolution. Our method better preserves fidelity while enhancing visual clarity.
Figure 5: Ablation of Attention Sparsity. Full attention leads to noticeable source-induced artifacts, whereas our sparse attention maintains superior visual fidelity and alignment.
Figure 6: Impact of sampling steps. Perceptual quality and high-frequency details are maximized at T=1. Increasing the number of inference steps does not yield significant visual gains, further validating the efficiency of our refinement framework.
Figure 7: Results of the user study across three dimensions: Detail Preservation, Realism, and Aesthetics. Our method consistently outperforms all baselines in human preference.
Figure 8: Visual results at 1K resolution.
Figure 9: Visual results at 2K resolution.

See the figures in the original paper →

Original abstract (English)

High-resolution image editing is increasingly demanded in professional workflows, yet existing diffusion-based models remain constrained to resolutions below 1K due to quadratic attention complexity and prohibitive memory requirements. A prevalent workaround employs a two-stage pipeline: editing at low resolution followed by independent super-resolution. However, this approach suffers from two critical issues: information divergence, where hallucinated details contradict the original high-resolution (HR) source, and texture degradation, manifesting as over-smoothed or over-sharpened artifacts. We propose EditBridge, a diffusion bridge framework for efficient ultra high-resolution editing. Unlike conventional diffusion that regenerates from noise, we formulate refinement as structured data-to-data translation from the low-resolution (LR) edited result to its HR counterpart, explicitly conditioned on the original HR source to preserve authentic details. To efficiently incorporate HR source guidance, we introduce a prior-guided block-wise sparse attention mechanism that exploits semantic correspondence from first-stage editing to constrain cross-image interactions to spatially aligned regions, significantly reducing computational overhead. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EditBridge achieves high-fidelity editing with superior perceptual quality at resolutions up to 4K, delivering 3.6--8.4times speedup at 2K and enabling practical 4K editing in 61 seconds.

Authors · Jiayi Song

Read on arXiv

Latest papers

All papers →

Latest from METAL MEDIA

NCT 127 drop BLINGY, their first full album in two years